Codingv2
Design a reusable CLI around a manual script
Convert a manual script into a reusable command-line tool
CLI interface design preserving script behavior with explicit error contract.
Needs: existing script · current workflow
OPEN PROMPT →PROMPT LIBRARY
Tested prompts for real AI workflows
Reusable prompts published only after structured QA and test runs. Browse by domain, then open the exact prompt, required inputs and expected output.
138 published prompts · 6 domains
Codingv2
Plan the code changes to wrap a script as a CLI
Convert a manual script into a reusable command-line tool
Minimal code-change plan for wrapping a script as a tested CLI.
Needs: script/repository · approved CLI design
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Review a new CLI for behavior and usability regressions
Convert a manual script into a reusable command-line tool
CLI regression review covering interface, errors, side effects and tests.
Needs: baseline behavior · CLI implementation
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv4
Build a reproducible bug-debugging plan from logs and code
Debug a reproducible bug from logs and source code
Reproduction-focused debugging plan with ranked hypotheses and verification tests.
Needs: bug report · logs and/or source code
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv4
Trace a bug from logs to candidate code paths
Debug a reproducible bug from logs and source code
Evidence-linked root-cause matrix connecting log signals to code paths and tests.
Needs: logs or stack traces · relevant code
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv4
Verify a proposed bug fix against reproduction and regression risks
Debug a reproducible bug from logs and source code
Fix verification report checking causal fit, reproduction and regressions.
Needs: bug reproduction · proposed fix
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Design a database migration with rollback and verification
Design a database migration with rollback and verification steps
Phased database migration plan with rollback, compatibility and verification checks.
Needs: current schema · desired database change
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Review database migration SQL for safety and reversibility
Design a database migration with rollback and verification steps
Pre-execution database migration SQL safety and reversibility review.
Needs: migration SQL · current database schema
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Verify a database migration rollout and reconciliation
Design a database migration with rollback and verification steps
Post-migration verification across schema, data, application and rollback readiness.
Needs: migration execution evidence · reconciliation results
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Build a change-impact map before editing an unfamiliar repository
Explain an unfamiliar repository before making changes
Change-impact map with confirmed dependencies, risks and unknowns.
Needs: proposed change · repository context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Explain an unfamiliar repository with an architecture map
Explain an unfamiliar repository before making changes
Evidence-based repository architecture and orientation map.
Needs: repository tree · key files
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Trace a request or workflow through an unfamiliar repository
Explain an unfamiliar repository before making changes
Source-linked lifecycle trace through an unfamiliar codebase.
Needs: workflow/request · repository code
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Audit dependencies for actual repository usage
Find dead code and unused dependencies in a repository
Dependency-usage audit with confidence and removal verification.
Needs: dependency manifest · repository context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Create and review a safe dead-code removal plan
Find dead code and unused dependencies in a repository
Reversible dead-code removal plan with evidence and regression checks.
Needs: verified dead-code candidates · repository
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Identify likely dead code from repository evidence
Find dead code and unused dependencies in a repository
Dead-code candidate inventory with confidence and verification requirements.
Needs: repository context · reference evidence
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Generate integration tests from an API contract
Generate integration tests from an API contract
Focused API integration tests with traceability and execution status.
Needs: API contract · approved test matrix · test framework context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Review API integration-test coverage against the contract
Generate integration tests from an API contract
Contract-based integration-test coverage audit.
Needs: API contract · integration test suite
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Turn an API contract into an integration-test matrix
Generate integration tests from an API contract
Integration-test matrix derived from a supplied API contract.
Needs: API contract · system context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv4
Derive a unit-test inventory before refactoring a function
Generate unit tests for an existing function before refactoring it
Behavior inventory and prioritized tests for a safe pre-refactor baseline.
Needs: function code · existing tests or behavior context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv4
Generate focused unit tests for an existing function
Generate unit tests for an existing function before refactoring it
Minimal unit tests/patch with explicit behavior mapping and execution status.
Needs: function code · approved test inventory · test framework context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv4
Review whether unit tests are sufficient for a planned refactor
Generate unit tests for an existing function before refactoring it
Test-sufficiency review focused on behavioral protection and brittleness.
Needs: function code · test suite · refactor plan
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Audit a completed framework migration for regressions
Migrate a library or framework version with minimal regressions
Post-migration regression and verification audit.
Needs: before and after migration state · validation results
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Create an implementation checklist for a framework migration
Migrate a library or framework version with minimal regressions
File-level migration implementation checklist with source basis and verification.
Needs: migration plan · repository · verified migration guide
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Plan a library or framework migration with minimal regressions
Migrate a library or framework version with minimal regressions
Incremental migration plan with verified breaking changes, tests and rollback.
Needs: current and target versions · repository context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv1
Assess a codebase and plan a bounded refactor
Refactor an existing codebase with an AI coding agent
Bounded refactor assessment with acceptance criteria, evidence-backed plan, invariants, validation steps, risks and non-goals.
Needs: refactor objective · relevant source code or repository context · behavior constraints
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv1
Execute a bounded codebase refactor safely
Refactor an existing codebase with an AI coding agent
Minimal applied refactor or patch plus exact change inventory, protected invariants, tests and non-fabricated validation results.
Needs: refactor acceptance criteria · repository context/files · protected behavior or API constraints
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv1
Review a refactor for regressions and scope creep
Refactor an existing codebase with an AI coding agent
Regression-focused refactor review with evidence-based verdict, blocking/non-blocking findings, scope creep and verification gaps.
Needs: refactor acceptance criteria · after state or diff
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Review a pull request for correctness and regressions
Review a pull request for correctness, regressions and maintainability
Regression-focused PR review with evidence and prioritized findings.
Needs: pull request diff · repository context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Review a pull request for maintainability and scope creep
Review a pull request for correctness, regressions and maintainability
Maintainability and scope review distinguishing real risks from style preferences.
Needs: pull request diff · PR objective
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Review API, security and data-flow changes in a pull request
Review a pull request for correctness, regressions and maintainability
Targeted PR audit of API, authorization, validation and data-flow changes.
Needs: pull request diff · architecture/security context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Build a root-cause hypothesis tree from production evidence
Trace the likely root cause of a production error from logs
Ranked production root-cause hypothesis tree with disconfirming tests.
Needs: incident timeline · technical evidence
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Build an evidence timeline for a production error
Trace the likely root cause of a production error from logs
Source-linked production incident timeline with causal uncertainty.
Needs: production logs/alerts · system/change context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv2
Verify remediation of a production error
Trace the likely root cause of a production error from logs
Production remediation verification with causal fit and rollback assessment.
Needs: root-cause evidence · fix and validation results
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv4
Derive acceptance criteria and tests from a feature request
Turn a feature request into an implementation plan
Acceptance criteria and test matrix covering happy path, failures and nonfunctional constraints.
Needs: feature request · existing behavior or user flow
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv4
Review a feature plan for architecture and rollout risk
Turn a feature request into an implementation plan
Architecture/rollout risk review with blockers, compatibility and observability gaps.
Needs: implementation plan · architecture context
OPEN PROMPT →Codingv4
Turn a feature request into an implementation plan
Turn a feature request into an implementation plan
Implementation plan with acceptance criteria, sequence, tests, rollout and open questions.
Needs: feature request · repository context
OPEN PROMPT →Data Analysisv2
Design an auditable cleaning plan for a messy CSV
Clean a messy CSV while preserving an audit trail
Deterministic CSV-cleaning plan with audit and validation rules.
Needs: CSV or sample · intended use
OPEN PROMPT →Data Analysisv2
Reconcile cleaned CSV output against the raw input
Clean a messy CSV while preserving an audit trail
CSV reconciliation QC for unexplained mutations and data loss.
Needs: raw and cleaned CSV · cleaning rules
OPEN PROMPT →Data Analysisv2
Turn CSV cleaning rules into a reproducible transformation specification
Clean a messy CSV while preserving an audit trail
Reproducible transformation specification with quarantine and audit behavior.
Needs: approved cleaning rules · source/target schema
OPEN PROMPT →Data Analysisv2
Design a dataset quality profiling plan
Profile a dataset and identify quality problems before analysis
Pre-analysis dataset profiling plan with reproducible quality checks.
Needs: dataset or schema · intended analysis purpose
OPEN PROMPT →Data Analysisv2
Prioritize remediation for dataset quality problems
Profile a dataset and identify quality problems before analysis
Prioritized, auditable remediation plan that avoids unsupported data correction.
Needs: dataset quality findings · intended use
OPEN PROMPT →Data Analysisv2
Profile a dataset and report quality problems
Profile a dataset and identify quality problems before analysis
Evidence-based dataset quality report with impact and remediation priorities.
Needs: dataset or profiling results · intended use
OPEN PROMPT →Knowledge & Productivityv2
Build a source-linked digest of a long document
Summarize a long document into decisions, facts and open questions
Compact source-linked digest with contradictions and not-found topics.
Needs: long document · priority topics
OPEN PROMPT →Knowledge & Productivityv2
Quality-control a long-document summary against the source
Summarize a long document into decisions, facts and open questions
Source-based QC of a long-document summary.
Needs: summary · source document
OPEN PROMPT →Knowledge & Productivityv2
Summarize a long document into decisions, facts and open questions
Summarize a long document into decisions, facts and open questions
Decision-oriented document summary separating facts, decisions and open questions.
Needs: long document · audience/purpose
OPEN PROMPT →Knowledge & Productivityv2
Build a relationship map across a document corpus
Turn a folder of documents into a structured knowledge map
Evidence-grounded knowledge graph/relationship map across documents.
Needs: classified document corpus · canonical taxonomy
OPEN PROMPT →Knowledge & Productivityv2
Inventory a document corpus and propose a knowledge taxonomy
Turn a folder of documents into a structured knowledge map
Document inventory and canonical taxonomy with ambiguity and duplicate handling.
Needs: document corpus · knowledge goals
OPEN PROMPT →Knowledge & Productivityv2
Quality-control a document knowledge map and identify stale knowledge
Turn a folder of documents into a structured knowledge map
Knowledge-map QC with unsupported links, staleness and revalidation queue.
Needs: knowledge map · underlying corpus
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Analyze conflicts and gaps in a case chronology
Build a chronology from pleadings, exhibits and correspondence
Conflict/gap analysis distinguishing contradictions, sequencing defects and missing evidence.
Needs: existing chronology · underlying source pack
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Build an evidence-linked litigation chronology
Build a chronology from pleadings, exhibits and correspondence
Evidence-linked litigation chronology with uncertainty, conflicts, gaps and source traceability.
Needs: source documents · source identifiers
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Turn a chronology into targeted follow-up questions
Build a chronology from pleadings, exhibits and correspondence
Prioritized witness and document follow-ups tied to specific chronology gaps and conflicts.
Needs: evidence-linked chronology · issues in dispute
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Audit every material proposition in a legal draft against its sources
Check a legal draft for unsupported propositions and citations
Claim-by-claim legal source audit with support status and corrections.
Needs: legal draft · source pack
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Check citation integrity in a legal draft
Check a legal draft for unsupported propositions and citations
Citation integrity report covering identity, fit, quotation, pinpoint, weight and currentness.
Needs: draft with citations · authority verification material
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Red-team a legal draft for overclaiming and hidden assumptions
Check a legal draft for unsupported propositions and citations
Severity-ranked review of overclaiming, assumptions and omitted qualifications.
Needs: legal draft · verified sources
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Build a conflicting-cases comparison matrix
Compare conflicting cases on the same legal issue
Case comparison matrix, conflict map, distinctions, synthesis and verification gaps.
Needs: legal issue · jurisdiction · verified case/source pack
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Reconcile two conflicting case lines
Compare conflicting cases on the same legal issue
Source-limited reconciliation showing hierarchy, distinctions, residual conflict and verification needs.
Needs: issue · jurisdiction · two verified authority lines
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Red-team a synthesis of conflicting cases
Compare conflicting cases on the same legal issue
Adversarial source audit with severity findings, corrected synthesis and verification queue.
Needs: draft synthesis · verified case/source pack · jurisdiction
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Compare two contract drafts by substantive change
Compare two contract drafts and explain substantive changes
Substantive redline matrix separating textual delta, practical effect and uncertainty.
Needs: two contract drafts · party role
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Explain the effect of a contract redline
Compare two contract drafts and explain substantive changes
Clause-level effect analysis with legal/commercial consequence, scenarios and dependencies.
Needs: before and after contract text · party role
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Find hidden or easily missed changes between contract drafts
Compare two contract drafts and explain substantive changes
QC report focused on definitions, schedules, numbers, exceptions and omitted substantive changes.
Needs: two contract drafts
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Draft a first-pass clause from an agreed commercial position
Draft a first-pass clause from a negotiated commercial position
First-pass clause with assumptions, dependencies, alternatives and legal-review flags.
Needs: commercial position · relevant contract context
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Draft primary and fallback clause positions
Draft a first-pass clause from a negotiated commercial position
Primary and fallback clause variants with explicit trade-offs and no unauthorized concessions.
Needs: primary position · approved fallback positions · contract context
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Verify a drafted clause against the negotiated position
Draft a first-pass clause from a negotiated commercial position
Conformity audit identifying unauthorized additions, omissions, ambiguity and scope drift.
Needs: draft clause · negotiated position · contract context
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv1
Draft a legal memo from verified authorities
Draft a legal memo from a set of verified authorities
Structured legal memorandum whose material propositions are limited to and traceable to verified supplied authorities.
Needs: legal question · jurisdiction · material facts · verified authorities
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv1
Draft the adverse-authority and counterargument section
Draft a legal memo from a set of verified authorities
A fair, source-limited adverse-authority/counterargument section with response, residual risk and verification notes.
Needs: proposed position · jurisdiction · verified authorities
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv1
Quality-control a legal memo against verified authorities
Draft a legal memo from a set of verified authorities
Final source-and-fact integrity audit with release verdict, severity findings, exact fixes and open verification queue.
Needs: draft memo · verified authority pack · material facts · jurisdiction
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Extract holding, dicta and procedural posture from a judgment
Extract holdings, dicta and procedural posture from a judgment
Structured case brief separating posture, facts, holdings, dicta, reasoning, disposition and pinpoints.
Needs: judgment text · issue focus
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Map propositions in a judgment to exact source locations
Extract holdings, dicta and procedural posture from a judgment
Proposition-to-pinpoint map with source role, legal classification and verification gaps.
Needs: judgment text · target topics
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Quality-control a case brief against the judgment
Extract holdings, dicta and procedural posture from a judgment
Source-grounded QC of a case brief with precise corrections and unverified items.
Needs: draft case brief · judgment text
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Extract consents, obligations and change-of-control triggers for diligence
Generate a due-diligence red-flag report from uploaded documents
Contract matrix of transaction-sensitive consents, restrictions and triggers.
Needs: relevant contracts · proposed transaction context
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Generate a due-diligence red-flag report from uploaded documents
Generate a due-diligence red-flag report from uploaded documents
Source-linked diligence red-flag report with materiality, uncertainty and follow-up.
Needs: diligence documents · transaction context · review scope
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Quality-control a due-diligence red-flag report
Generate a due-diligence red-flag report from uploaded documents
QC audit of diligence findings, severity, qualifications and source coverage.
Needs: draft diligence report · underlying documents
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Map a litigation theory to evidence and gaps
Identify missing evidence for a litigation theory
Element-by-element evidence matrix, contrary evidence, gaps and prioritized follow-up.
Needs: litigation theory · available evidence
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Prioritize an evidence-development plan
Identify missing evidence for a litigation theory
Ranked evidence-development workplan with dependencies, constraints and stop conditions.
Needs: evidence gap matrix · procedural stage · known constraints
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Red-team a litigation theory against the record
Identify missing evidence for a litigation theory
Adversarial theory audit with unsupported steps, contrary evidence and critical gaps.
Needs: draft litigation theory · evidence record
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Build an issue map from a new case file
Prepare an issue list from a new case file
Initial matter issue map separating facts, legal questions, evidence gaps, deadlines and actions.
Needs: case file · client objective
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Red-team an initial case issue list for omissions
Prepare an issue list from a new case file
Omission-focused second review of a new-matter issue list.
Needs: draft issue list · underlying case file
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Turn a case issue list into an evidence-and-action matrix
Prepare an issue list from a new case file
Operational matrix connecting issues to evidence, law, actions, dependencies and deadlines.
Needs: issue list · case documents
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Build a deposition question outline from pleadings and evidence
Prepare deposition or witness interview questions from a case file
Issue-based deposition outline with source-linked foundations and follow-up branches.
Needs: pleadings · evidence pack · witness role
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Prepare a neutral fact-witness interview outline
Prepare deposition or witness interview questions from a case file
Neutral witness interview outline tied to sources and factual gaps.
Needs: case file · witness role · issues
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Review witness questions for assumptions, gaps and source integrity
Prepare deposition or witness interview questions from a case file
QC report on witness questions for assumptions, source integrity and missed gaps.
Needs: draft question outline · case file
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv1
Legal authority verification table
Research a legal issue and verify every cited authority
Verification table with explicit verified/partial/unverified/contradicted status, source locations, currentness limits and follow-up.
Needs: authorities or propositions to verify · verification material
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv1
Red-team a legal research memo against its sources
Research a legal issue and verify every cited authority
Reproducible red-team audit with severity-ranked source defects, precise corrections and verification queue.
Needs: draft memo · jurisdiction · authority/source pack
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv1
Source-verified legal research memo
Research a legal issue and verify every cited authority
Issue; short answer; authorities table; source-linked analysis; adverse/conflicting authority; gaps; research trail.
Needs: jurisdiction · as-of date · legal question · authority/source pack
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Compare a contract against an approved playbook
Review a contract for clauses that create material legal risk
Playbook deviation matrix with severity, fallbacks, cross-clause effects and unresolved decisions.
Needs: contract text · approved playbook
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Review a contract for material legal and commercial risk
Review a contract for clauses that create material legal risk
Prioritized clause-risk report with source pinpoints, consequences, uncertainty and negotiation response.
Needs: contract text · party role · transaction context
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Turn contract risks into negotiation options
Review a contract for clauses that create material legal risk
Issue-by-issue negotiation options with primary ask, fallback, rationale and residual risk.
Needs: contract risk report · contract text · business priorities
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Map and verify authorities cited in an opposing brief
Summarize an opposing party brief and map its authorities
Authority map with proposition fit, weight, treatment and response significance.
Needs: opposing brief · authority verification material
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Map the arguments in an opposing-party brief
Summarize an opposing party brief and map its authorities
Argument map separating propositions, factual premises, authorities and dependencies.
Needs: opposing brief · case context
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Prepare response issues to an opposing brief from the record
Summarize an opposing party brief and map its authorities
Prioritized response outline tied to record and verified authorities.
Needs: argument map · verified authority map · record
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Build a position history for open contract issues
Turn negotiation comments into a clean contract issues list
Chronological position history with source evidence, movement and current status.
Needs: dated negotiation record · issues to track
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Consolidate negotiation comments into an issues matrix
Turn negotiation comments into a clean contract issues list
Deduplicated negotiation matrix with positions, movement, status, current text and unresolved questions.
Needs: negotiation comments · current contract version
OPEN PROMPT →Legalv4
Prepare a contract-negotiation handoff brief
Turn negotiation comments into a clean contract issues list
Concise negotiation handoff with settled points, open issues, fallbacks, approvals and priorities.
Needs: current issues matrix · latest contract
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Add provenance and source-quality fields to an evidence table
Build an evidence table from a set of source documents
Evidence table augmented with provenance, independence, recency and quality caveats.
Needs: evidence table · source metadata
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Build an evidence table from source documents
Build an evidence table from a set of source documents
Auditable evidence matrix with source pinpoints, caveats, conflicts and missing fields.
Needs: source documents · research question
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Quality-control and normalize an evidence table
Build an evidence table from a set of source documents
QC and normalized evidence matrix with an explicit correction log.
Needs: evidence table · underlying sources
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Compare conflicting claims across web sources
Compare claims across multiple conflicting web sources
Claim comparison matrix with provenance, dates, disagreement and uncertainty.
Needs: claim/question · source set
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Map provenance and incentives across conflicting web sources
Compare claims across multiple conflicting web sources
Provenance map of source role, independence, common origins and evidence quality.
Needs: web source set · claim
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Synthesize consensus and uncertainty from conflicting web evidence
Compare claims across multiple conflicting web sources
Calibrated synthesis separating established facts, disputes, unknowns and decision implications.
Needs: evidence matrix · research question
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Create an annotated bibliography from a research corpus
Create an annotated bibliography from a research corpus
Annotated bibliography with relevance, methods/evidence, findings and limitations.
Needs: research corpus · research question
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Organize an annotated bibliography by theme
Create an annotated bibliography from a research corpus
Theme-organized bibliography preserving contradictions and source differences.
Needs: research corpus · research question
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Quality-control an annotated bibliography against the corpus
Create an annotated bibliography from a research corpus
Bibliography QC with source checks, duplicates and corrected annotations.
Needs: draft bibliography · source corpus
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Extract factual claims into a source ledger
Extract factual claims and attach the supporting source for each
Claim-level source ledger with support status, pinpoints and provenance.
Needs: material to analyze · source material
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Map sentences to their supporting sources
Extract factual claims and attach the supporting source for each
Sentence-level claim-to-source map with overstatement and independence checks.
Needs: draft · source pack
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Quality-control claim-to-source attribution
Extract factual claims and attach the supporting source for each
QC of claim attribution with circular sourcing, staleness and correction log.
Needs: claim-source table · underlying sources
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Design a study-characteristics extraction schema
Extract study characteristics into a structured evidence matrix
Predefined evidence-matrix schema and data dictionary for study extraction.
Needs: review question · eligible study designs
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Extract study characteristics into an evidence matrix
Extract study characteristics into a structured evidence matrix
Source-traceable study-characteristics evidence matrix.
Needs: study papers · locked extraction schema
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Quality-control a study-characteristics evidence matrix
Extract study characteristics into a structured evidence matrix
Study-extraction QC with corrections and adjudication queue.
Needs: evidence matrix · source papers
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Build a provenance chain for a reported fact
Find primary sources behind a secondary-source claim
Provenance chain locating the original evidence behind a reported fact.
Needs: source set · target fact
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Trace a secondary claim back to its primary source
Find primary sources behind a secondary-source claim
Primary-source provenance trace with proposition-fit and wording-drift analysis.
Needs: secondary source · claim
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Verify whether a primary source supports a secondary claim
Find primary sources behind a secondary-source claim
Direct primary-vs-secondary claim verification with narrower supported wording.
Needs: secondary claim · primary source
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Classify why sources disagree
Identify consensus, disagreement and uncertainty in a source set
Taxonomy of source disagreement causes and resolvability.
Needs: conflicting source set · target claims
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Map consensus, disagreement and uncertainty in a source set
Identify consensus, disagreement and uncertainty in a source set
Proposition-level consensus map with provenance and uncertainty.
Needs: research question · source set
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Write an uncertainty-calibrated synthesis from a source set
Identify consensus, disagreement and uncertainty in a source set
Calibrated synthesis preserving uncertainty and decision relevance.
Needs: evidence or consensus map · research question
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Build an evidence ledger during deep web research
Run a deep web research task with source verification
Claim-level evidence ledger with verification, provenance and follow-up.
Needs: research question · candidate sources or claims
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Red-team a deep-research report against the web evidence
Run a deep web research task with source verification
Fact-checking audit of a deep research report with source-chain and staleness analysis.
Needs: draft report · source list
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Run a source-verified deep web research task
Run a deep web research task with source verification
Source-backed deep research report with evidence table and research log.
Needs: research question · scope
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv1
Build a systematic review protocol
Run a systematic literature review with AI assistance
Reproducible systematic-review protocol with eligibility criteria, search logic, screening workflow, extraction schema and synthesis plan.
Needs: research question · review objective · intended information sources or databases
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv1
Screen records against systematic-review criteria
Run a systematic literature review with AI assistance
Record-level INCLUDE/EXCLUDE/UNCERTAIN decisions with evidence, protocol-based reasons and adjudication flags.
Needs: locked inclusion criteria · locked exclusion criteria · records to screen
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv1
Synthesize an extracted systematic-review evidence table
Run a systematic literature review with AI assistance
Auditable evidence map, outcome findings matrix, structured synthesis, heterogeneity/limitations and calibrated conclusion.
Needs: research question · included-study extraction table
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Operationalize abstract-screening inclusion and exclusion criteria
Screen abstracts against explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria
Operational screening rules and exclusion taxonomy for systematic review abstracts.
Needs: review question · eligibility criteria
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Quality-control abstract screening decisions
Screen abstracts against explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria
Screening QC with corrected decisions and adjudication queue.
Needs: screening decisions · records · locked criteria
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Screen abstracts against explicit eligibility criteria
Screen abstracts against explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria
Record-level INCLUDE/EXCLUDE/UNCERTAIN screening with evidence and adjudication flags.
Needs: locked eligibility criteria · records
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Quality-control a research report summary against the original
Summarize a long research report without losing caveats
Source-based QC for research summary accuracy and caveat preservation.
Needs: draft summary · original research report
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Summarize a long research report without losing caveats
Summarize a long research report without losing caveats
Caveat-preserving research report summary with source locations and evidence limits.
Needs: research report · audience or use context
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Turn a long research report into an executive evidence brief
Summarize a long research report without losing caveats
Executive evidence brief preserving material uncertainty and scope.
Needs: research report · decision context
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Decompose a research question into testable hypotheses
Turn a broad question into a structured research plan
Hypothesis map distinguishing assumptions, evidence, falsifiers, dependencies and ambiguity.
Needs: research question · context
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Design source coverage for a research project
Turn a broad question into a structured research plan
Source coverage matrix prioritizing primary evidence, corroboration, recency and gap tracking.
Needs: research plan · allowed source context
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv4
Turn a broad question into a structured research plan
Turn a broad question into a structured research plan
Research plan with subquestions, evidence needs, source hierarchy, scope and stopping criteria.
Needs: broad research question · decision context
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Convert research notes into a claim-evidence table before drafting
Turn research notes into a source-backed briefing
Normalized claim-evidence table separating verified evidence from notes and tasks.
Needs: research notes · source materials
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Red-team a source-backed research briefing
Turn research notes into a source-backed briefing
Adversarial source audit of a research briefing.
Needs: draft briefing · source pack
OPEN PROMPT →Researchv2
Turn research notes into a source-backed briefing
Turn research notes into a source-backed briefing
Decision-oriented source-backed briefing with claim traceability and verification queue.
Needs: research notes · source pack · research objective
OPEN PROMPT →Video & Audiov2
Diagnose quality problems in an authorized voice clone
Clone your own voice for narration
Authorization-gated, evidence-based voice-clone diagnosis with ranked hypotheses, controlled tests and acceptance criteria.
Needs: explicit speaker authorization · observed problem or sample/measurement
OPEN PROMPT →Video & Audiov2
Direct narration for an authorized voice clone
Clone your own voice for narration
Authorization-gated narration brief and segmented script with delivery direction, pronunciation checks and compatible markup only when known.
Needs: explicit speaker authorization · narration script
OPEN PROMPT →Video & Audiov2
Plan a recording session for your own voice clone
Clone your own voice for narration
Authorization-gated recording plan with session blocks, coverage matrix, audio QC, tool-requirement verification and privacy checklist.
Needs: explicit authorization that the speaker is the user or has consented · intended use
OPEN PROMPT →Video & Audiov2
Build a generator-ready image-to-video prompt
Turn a still image into a short AI video
Compact generator-ready image-to-video prompt with continuity constraints, locked elements and no invented tool syntax.
Needs: image/reference description · desired outcome
OPEN PROMPT →Video & Audiov2
Diagnose and improve an image-to-video result
Turn a still image into a short AI video
Evidence-based diagnosis, prioritized fixes, revised prompt and next-run validation checklist.
Needs: original prompt/brief · observed result or concrete defect description
OPEN PROMPT →Video & Audiov2
Turn a still image into a motion brief
Turn a still image into a short AI video
Structured motion brief with locked elements, temporal beats, continuity constraints and a generator-neutral prompt.
Needs: image/reference or faithful image description · creative goal
OPEN PROMPT →No matching prompts.