← Developer Infrastructure
Developer Infrastructure · AI Security

Adrian

Open-source runtime security monitoring and control toolkit for AI agents that captures agent telemetry and reasoning context, evaluates actions against security policies, and can alert, pause or block risky actions before execution.

8.3OUT OF 10 · LOW CONF.

Product facts

Category
Developer Infrastructure / AI Security
Pricing
Open-source toolkit is free; managed/hosted service exists, with commercial pricing not publicly verified in this run.
Free access
YES
Platforms
Web, Self-hosted, Python, TypeScript
API
YES
Open source
YES
Integrations
LangChain, LangGraph, Claude Code, Slack, Discord, WhatsApp
Last updated
2026-09-09
PRODUCT / PRICING SOURCE ↗

Adrian review

Updated 2026-09-10

Product & capabilities

Adrian is an open-source runtime security monitoring and control engine for AI agents. Its SDK captures agent actions, outputs and reasoning context, evaluates behavior against policies, and can alert operators, pause a risky action, require approval or block execution. The project documents Python/LangChain/LangGraph, TypeScript and a Claude Code plugin, plus Slack, Discord and WhatsApp alerting paths. 1 2

The repository also provides a self-hosted stack with backend, dashboard, SDK and local model container. That materially distinguishes Adrian from a cloud-only monitoring service and makes the implementation surface inspectable.

Pricing & access

The open-source toolkit is free. Secure Agentics also provides a managed dashboard; current public terms say the service is free at launch but impose token-based usage limits, and commercial long-term hosted pricing was not verified in this review. Self-hosting requires Docker and, for the documented bundled local classifier path, an NVIDIA GPU is recommended while CPU-only operation is described as possible but slow. 1 3

That makes software access strong but infrastructure and operational cost variable, especially for organizations choosing self-hosting to retain full data sovereignty.

Evidence & trust

The public repository is meaningful inspectability evidence: it contains the self-hosting stack, SDKs, security policy and integration code. Secure Agentics claims Adrian improves detection accuracy and catches more nuanced attacks than behavior-only monitoring, but those performance claims are vendor-authored and were not independently reproduced by AiToolMap. 1

Crunchbase independently corroborates Secure Agentics and Adrian as an open-source runtime security toolkit with hosted-backend option, but does not supply efficacy testing. 4

Safety & Trust

Adrian is a defensive control, not a guarantee of agent safety. Its effectiveness depends on seeing the relevant action/reasoning path, correct policy configuration and the accuracy of its analysis. A false negative can still permit destructive infrastructure actions or data exfiltration, so least privilege, sandboxing, credential isolation and conventional monitoring remain necessary.

Privacy deserves specific attention because Adrian can capture reasoning traces, tool calls and other contextual telemetry. Self-hosting can keep the stack and model local; in managed mode, teams should treat the transmitted telemetry as potentially sensitive and apply their own data-classification and retention requirements. The terms also state that if hosted usage limits are exceeded, classification may stop while the underlying agent continues running, making fail-open behavior a deployment consideration. 1 3

The fixed 50-source AiToolMap panel returned no eligible exact-product numeric user-rating signal: 45 no relevant results and five inaccessible sources. No AiToolMap hands-on test was performed.

Who it's for

Adrian fits developers, platform teams and security teams that want runtime visibility and intervention rather than input/output filtering alone. It is especially relevant when agents have consequential tools and the organization wants a self-hosted option plus human approval and messaging integrations. 2

It is less suitable for teams that cannot expose reasoning/context to a monitor, expect a mature independent benchmark record, or need a hosted control that is contractually guaranteed never to stop classifying under usage limits.

Strengths & weaknesses

Strengths

open-source implementation; self-hosted and managed modes; Python and TypeScript paths; LangChain/LangGraph and Claude Code integration; pre-execution block/approval modes; local classifier option; operational alerts; transparent hosted usage-limit terms. 1 3

Weaknesses

independent efficacy evidence is scarce; vendor performance claims remain unreplicated; reasoning telemetry can be highly sensitive; self-hosting adds GPU/operations burden; hosted limits can suspend monitoring while the protected agent continues; managed pricing beyond launch was not publicly verified.

SOURCES

Sources & references

4 sources
  1. Official sourcesecureagentics/Adrian
    OFFICIAL
  2. Official sourceAdrian | Secure Agentics
    OFFICIAL
  3. Official sourceTerms of Service | Secure Agentics
    OFFICIAL
  4. SourceSecure Agentics | Crunchbase
    REPORT

Related AI tools

Products matched by shared tasks, audience, workflow, product type and capabilities.

AI
Prefactor
Prefactor is a focused production-agent reliability platform that combines observability, continuous evaluation and runtime enforcement rather than stopping at traces and dashboards. Its current product and security model are unusually concrete for a young tool, but independent validation is still limited: Product Hunt has launch traction but no reviews, G2 has zero ratings and still describes an older MCP-oriented surface, and the strongest reliability claims remain first-party.
WHY RELATED · Similar input/output: Agent activity · Same category
6.6/10AITOOLMAP RATINGRATING CONFIDENCE · LOW