Postiz

The current Postiz product can plan, generate, preview and schedule content across 30+ networks. Each channel can receive its own copy/media treatment before cross-posting. Paid plans include AI text generation; image and video allowances increase by tier. The Smart Agent can draft content, create media, schedule posts and analyze performance through natural-language requests.

Postiz is especially differentiated at the integration layer. The public API, webhooks, MCP tooling, n8n/Make integrations and support for external agents such as Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Cursor and OpenClaw make it possible to treat Postiz as a social-publishing endpoint inside a larger autonomous workflow rather than only as a dashboard.

The project is also self-hostable and open source, which materially changes the deployment/value proposition for technical teams. Official documentation exposes API keys and scheduling/upload endpoints, while hosted and self-hosted deployments are intended to share the same core product surface.

Hosted Standard is $29/month for 5 channels; Team is $39/month for 10 channels; Pro is $49/month for 30 channels; Ultimate is $99/month for 100 channels. Annual billing is advertised at roughly 20% less. Team and higher tiers include unlimited team members. Postiz offers a 7-day hosted trial, while self-hosting the open-source version can be free apart from infrastructure and operational costs.

The reviewed source set has limited exact-product coverage. Trustpilot currently shows 2.9/5 from only four reviews. That sample is too small for a robust quantitative product signal and is better treated as a weak service-experience signal. Most other reviewed editorial/benchmark sources have no substantive current Postiz coverage.

Outside the main reviewed source set, Product Hunt provides a more useful product-specific corpus: 4.2/5 from 10 reviews at capture time. Reviewers repeatedly praise broad platform coverage, clean design, AI/automation and MCP capabilities; recurring criticisms include deeper analytics, deployment smoothness and repetitive reuse/duplication workflows. The sample remains small, so it is qualitative support rather than decisive evidence.

A detailed August 2026 review from PostMonk scores Postiz 3.4/5 and highlights open-source deployment, 30+ channels and MCP as strengths while criticizing the lack of a queue, social inbox and richer analytics. PostMonk builds a competing social scheduler, so the review is useful for concrete feature comparison but carries an explicit competitive-interest limitation.

Postiz is best for developers, AI operators, privacy-sensitive teams and agencies that value self-hosting, API access and agent integration. It is also attractive to creators managing many platforms who want one cross-posting calendar plus AI generation. It is less suitable for full-time social-care teams that require a mature unified inbox, deep client-ready reporting or highly sophisticated analytics.