Wikis.ai

Wikis.ai is a web workspace for sending one prompt to several AI models and comparing their answers side by side. The current surface emphasizes comparison rather than automatic synthesis: users can inspect differences, continue with a selected model, use the public AI Wiki as a research starting point, and on paid plans compare up to eight model conversations with searchable history, share links, Markdown/PNG export and web search. The model catalog spans major providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, Kimi, MiniMax and Qwen. ¹²

The Free plan costs $0 and currently includes 60 Basic and 6 Advanced model prompts per month without a card. Pro is $19 month-to-month or $14.99/month when billed annually ($179.88/year), with 10,000 Basic and 1,500 Advanced prompts. Unlimited is $39 month-to-month or $24.99/month annually ($299.88/year), with unlimited Basic and Advanced prompts. Paid plans include the listed models without requiring separate ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini subscriptions. Each model response consumes one prompt from the relevant allowance, so a four-model comparison consumes four prompts. ²

Wikis.ai documents its current product and pricing clearly, but exact-product independent evidence is still sparse. The privacy policy says prompts, conversation context and selected files may be sent to the third-party model providers chosen by the user, and advises against submitting secrets, regulated data or personal information the user is not authorized to share. It also states that personal information is not sold and that users may request access, correction or deletion subject to applicable rules. These are first-party policy commitments rather than independent security assurance. Because no substantive independent product test or eligible numeric rating corpus surfaced in the current evidence audit, answer quality, latency and reliability should not be inferred from model breadth alone. ³

Wikis.ai is best for researchers, knowledge workers and AI power users who routinely compare how different models answer the same question. It is particularly attractive for users who value side-by-side disagreement detection and want one subscription covering several providers. It is a weaker fit for teams that need deep enterprise administration, documented API access, specialized workflow integrations or independently validated performance guarantees. ¹²